Odd Culture Facebook PageOdd Culture FeedOdd Culture Twitter Page

You might have noticed that your favorite Gawker Media sites: Gawker, Gizmodo, Jalopnik, Jezebel, etc – all look very different this morning. They’ve redesigned, and it’s not for the better.

The site uses jQuery, a scripting language, to pull in new and fresh content – the overall effect is busy, probably too busy. And the redesign is a Search Engine Optimziation (SEO) nightmare. Here’s what Google sees now when it tries to load, for example, Gawker:

Yep, that’s all the search engines can read from the Gawker redesign. “111″.

Fail. We couldn’t read it with the text-based Lynx browser either. And a quick trip through Xenu’s Redirect Checker came back with a 302 redirect to… nothing.

Ouch.

So, search engines can’t read it, but do people want to read it? A look at the traffic suggests the verdict is no:

From our limited time hanging out on the site, it seems to have more bugs than a two-star NYC hotel bed. Comments won’t load, much less post.

We’re going to go ahead and give the Gawker/Jezebel/Gizmodo/Deadspin redesign two thumbs down, both for user and search experience. God, you guys are making “The AOL Way” look like a brilliant online manifesto.

Also, there’s a huge BETA tag when you click to the About page on Gawker: we’re taking this to mean that the design will probably be rolled back, and soon, and probably some heads will roll. Hey, if y’all at Gawker wanna hire someone competent in SEO and analysis… drop a note on this post. Thanks.




One Response to “Gawker Media Redesign: So Horrible, So Very Horrible”


  1. Bill G says:

    Lynx won’t load it.
    Do you know if they get most of their views from visitor loyalty or search engines? One thing I noticed is that the right sidebar never moves with the content. A little jarring upon first inspection, but maybe good for ad revenue, since the square ad box never leaves your sight.

Leave a Reply