If Provocative Mudflaps Are Outlawed…
Written by Alyx on February 18th, 2007 in Government, culture, funny pictures.
…only outlaws will own provocative mudflaps.
“Fox and Friends” just reported that this week, the Arizona House rejected a bill that would have banned mudflaps with “images that are obscene or hateful.”
Sam looks a little hateful and violent. I wonder if he would have been out of luck:
It is, however, more likely they were after this little lady. To quote one of the representatives:
“I personally am tired of explaining to my 11-year-old son why they (women) are depicted on mudflaps, but not all women are 36Ds. He’s very confused by that,” said Rep. Theresa Ulmer, a Yuma Democrat.
Sometimes those naked-chick mudflaps also bear the legend “Haulin’ Ass,” which presumably ups the offensiveness factor.
Here’s a picture of Theresa Ulmer from her campaign website. Probably not rocking a 36D brassiere from what I can tell from this picture:
I ran a search for mudflaps, and found out they also exist for motorcycles, this one with a more detailed stripper. I should like to email this photo to Theresa Ulmer to see if she would actively crap herself.
Hooray for boobies!
February 18th, 2007 at 11:42 am
All skin on the image is black due to the fender, dumbass!
Blackface? You just looking for a fight.
February 18th, 2007 at 11:50 am
The rest of her skin is white, except for the face — the only thing that’s black otherwise is clothes and she’s wearing garters and a top — at least as far as I can tell.
February 18th, 2007 at 1:41 pm
The upper thigh, midriff and shoulders are exposed skin. All black. Her hair, halter, shorts, boots/stockings, riding crop and gloves are all white. Doesn’t make it any less weird, though.
February 18th, 2007 at 1:42 pm
Anything that’s white is clothing, not skin.
February 18th, 2007 at 1:44 pm
No, it’s a B/W negative — the black thigh-high boots, elbow-length gloves, 2-piece outfit, and hair show up as white, and everything else black.
February 18th, 2007 at 1:50 pm
Ah, okay. Then she’s actually wearing a hell of a lot more clothes than I suspected! Edited post.
February 18th, 2007 at 2:19 pm
Y’all have too much time to waste. Do something useful for a change!
February 18th, 2007 at 2:30 pm
No way! I masturbate to those mud-flaps!
February 18th, 2007 at 2:38 pm
abuuuuuuuuh… y’all?! and who are you to say we have too much time to waste? you’re posting about nothing. I for one, would tell me son, “look here son. some women, are lucky, and have 36D breasts for us male population to oogle ad enjoy. Some women don’t have that size of breasts, but it’s ok, because usually they have the bomb ass.” it might not go down exactly like that, but honestly, kids see more skin on the saturday morning cartoons nowadays. get over it world, get over it.
February 18th, 2007 at 3:37 pm
OMg im from AZ. WE are over run with these fanatics here. Thier husbands have money and run them for the senate to shut them up. Most are in real estate. This one here really makes me sic. Church, home and a ice cream parlor, what more credentials could you need?
February 18th, 2007 at 3:48 pm
Says she is tired of explaining (to her son) why women are on the mudflaps, but doesn’t say why her son keeps asking the question. Maybe she should stop acting as a politician, and act as a mother by actually answering the question.
February 18th, 2007 at 4:04 pm
One more, Arizona was created by truckers, they may be a little rude, crude, But they are even more red neck then your little disneyland attitude. Tell your kids these are the guys that bring their milk and cereal. Think before belch. Im from SV never heard of you but im hunting. Had enough of the SV real estate ..gonna be a legislator/judge.. Borowick kinda crp. 0o but you made national attention. Im so proud. Paris Hilton did a better job!
February 18th, 2007 at 4:11 pm
sry had to rant that pos really pissed me off. Im serious im from that area and just look at her picture.
February 18th, 2007 at 4:40 pm
losers, all.
February 18th, 2007 at 5:39 pm
Since when did we become Puritania? I’m SO sick of the prudes in this country.
February 18th, 2007 at 5:52 pm
[...] Source [Oddculture] [...]
February 18th, 2007 at 6:58 pm
Paul asked a good question-google Anthony Comstock it will be enlightning
February 18th, 2007 at 7:11 pm
How stupid… Makes me want to go out and buy the biggest set of truck testicles I can find.
February 18th, 2007 at 10:43 pm
The truck mudflap art design used to be sold along with other draftsman’s templates called “FRENCH CURVES” which were serious art tools of pre-computer times - the curvey lady was a tongue in cheek joke referencing the other “french” curves - you could buy them in art stores made of the same material as the “true” french curves templates. People need to get a sense of humor. geeez
February 19th, 2007 at 8:42 am
I had four of the naked beauties made out of half inch brass.They were support for the swimgrid on my classic 1947 40ft Monk crusier.They were put on the boat in 1972,14 yrs before I bought her.Everyone who saw the naked beauties in the 10yrs I owned the boat Christina,like them.I believe that more than half of the people who saw them were women.I sold the boat in 1992 and wish I didn’t.The naked lady has been around for years and I hope for many more years to come.I can only say that those who dont like her.You must be suffering from boob envy.Dont use your children.
February 19th, 2007 at 1:14 pm
The son is “confused”? Confused about why he is g@y? I was never confused by huge b00bies. Hell, by any b00bies for that matter. I think theyre GRRRREAAAAT!
February 20th, 2007 at 11:30 pm
Maybe call Representative Ulmer directly. She apparently has an office and also email: http://www.azleg.state.az.us/MembersPage.asp?Member_ID=57&Legislature=48
February 21st, 2007 at 1:08 am
She’s gross too: http://photoarchive.azwestern.edu/details.php?img=000_9460_political_debate_6×4_kl_web.jpg
February 25th, 2007 at 9:31 am
I have to ask Mrs. Ulmer to explain to me why she assumes the lady is naked? Having nothing but chrome appearance, and no color, how do we know that the creator of this didn’t picture her in a bikini?, Or possibly a skin suit? Either way, Mrs. Ulmer has waaaaaay to much time on her hands!
March 6th, 2007 at 10:23 am
And while she is at it, they should ban the decays that show the back side of the kid
urinating on some object or word. And ban any adult related billboards and
beer ads and …… The list goes on.
And it’s all for the sake of the children. How about saving the children from our
over-sexed media?
February 28th, 2008 at 1:51 pm
In agreeance with GPURVES… There’s not even a nipple… COME ON!
Some people just don’t know how to judge when politics end and freedom of speech begins!